Legal Opinion

Mart v. Severson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2002No. A095456PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.—

I. Introduction

Bradley C. Mart (Mart) and Leland Severson (Severson) are the sole shareholders of Bay World Trading Ltd. (Bay World). Mart appeals from a decree which provides that Bay World will be dissolved unless Bay World and/or Severson elects to buy out Mart’s shares in the corporation. Mart argues that the superior court’s determination of the “fair value” of his Bay World shares was erroneous as a matter of law. We agree and, therefore, reverse the trial court’s order.

II. Corporations Code Section 2000

This appeal is from a special proceeding conducted pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Brown v. Allied Corrugated Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Abrams v. Abrams-Rubaloff & Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Ronald v. 4-C's Electronic Packaging, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lozada v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. SalcidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Trahan v. TrahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Dickson v. RehmkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Cotton v. Expo Power Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API