Ripple v. Succop
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 47, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from order of C. P. Huntingdon Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 140, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Thomas J. C. Ripple for use of G. L. Owens v. Benjamin F. Ripple and Charles E. Succop, terre-tenant. Rule to open judgment. Before Woods, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts of the case. Error assigned was order discharging the rule to open the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
This is an appeal from the discharge of a rule to show cause why a judgment, entered in 1900 in favor of Thomas J. C. Ripple against Benjamin F. Ripple upon a judgment note signed by the latter, should not be opened. The rule was granted upon the petition of a purchaser from defendant therein of land which yvas bound by its lien. The deed under which he holds was delivered on January 13, 1904. The respondent, by whom the application to open was opposed, claimed under an undated written assignment of the judgment, not filed of record until August, 1904, but alleged in his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
- Cloud v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Heist v. TobiasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Italo French Produce Co. v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michigan Ammonia Works v. EllkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911