Heist v. Tobias
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 504, Jan. T., 1896, by defendant, from order of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., No. 90, discharging rule to strike off and open judgment. Rule to strike off and open judgment. Before Craig, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in discharging rule.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Green,
This proceeding was an application by petition to the court below to strike off or open a judgment. The plaintiff in the judgment is S. B. Heist and the defendant Esther Tobias. The defendant set forth certain facts in her petition affecting the giving and entering of the judgment, and the purpose it was intended to subserve, which if true entitled her to the relief she asked. A very considerable amount of testimony was taken on both sides, under the rule to show cause, and the application was disposed of by the learned court below upon the views *444expressed in the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State Camp of Penna. of Patriotic Sons of America v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- O'Connor v. FlickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Michigan Ammonia Works v. EllkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Ripple v. SuccopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906