Cloud v. Markle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 37, Jan. T.^ 1898, by defendants, from order of C. P. Chester Co., April T., 1897, No. 69, discharging rule to open judgment. Rule to open judgment. The facts appear by the opinion oE the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Gbeen,
This was an application by the defendants in a judgment to have the judgment opened and the defendants let into a defense. The petition set forth the facts upon which the application was based, a rule to show cause was granted, testimony was taken, and after argument in the court below the rule was discharged with a short opinion stating the reasons for the action of the court. After having carefully read and considered the whole of the testimony we have reached a different conclusion, and think the rule should have been made absolute and the whole matter sent to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Thomas & Sons v. Loose, Seaman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Clinch Valley Coal & Iron Co. ex rel. Grove v. WillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Earley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Diver v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Deviney v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- United States v. Gleneagles Inv. Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States Savings and Trust Co. v. HelselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.