In re the Estate of Lewin
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Piebsox R. Hildbeth, S.
This is an application by an attorney under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act to fix and determine his compensation for services rendered to the administratrix in settlement of her husband’s estate. He also requests that his compensation for services stated to have been rendered to the administratrix individually be fixed.
It- seems regrettable that the attorney and administratrix are in controversy in this very small estate. The decedent died intestate survived by his wife and three adult children. The only true estate assets which came into the hands of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In Re Estate of PottsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Estate of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re the Accounting of ElliottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re WarmsleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
- In re the Estate of KeatingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975