Rouse, Hazard & Co. v. Donovan
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to vacate an order denying its motion for the issuance of an execution against the individual members of a limited partnership association, under How. Stat. § 2366. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The relator, a foreign corporation, recovered judgment against the Detroit Cycle Company, a limited partnership association, for $1,705.50-and costs, being for goods sold. The cycle company was organized under chapter 79, How. Stat. Execution was issued, and returned nulla bona. The plaintiff then moved the court for an order directing execution to issue against the individual members of the defendant to the extent of the portions of their subscriptions, respectively, in the capital of the association not paid up. The motion was based upon the files and records of the cause, and upon an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Weimer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Parsons v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Chappee v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co. v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Burt v. Munising Woodenware Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Rouse, Hazard & Co. v. Detroit Cycle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. GansleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.