Legal Opinion

Benson v. SRT Communications, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2012No. 20110164PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard and Elaine Benson, Bill and Mary Bliven, Don and Annette Feist, Pat Lynch, and Lloyd and Donna Tribitt (“Bensons”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claim that SRT Communications, Inc., is contractually obligated to provide them post-retirement health and medical benefits. We affirm the judgment, concluding the Bensons’ action is governed by federal law and they failed to raise a disputed issue of material fact.

*555I

[¶ 2] Northern States Power (“NSP”) owned a telephone business in Minot, North Dakota, which it sold in 1991 to Minot Telephone Company…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Knudson v. KylloNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Miller v. Walsh County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API