Benson v. SRT Communications, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Richard and Elaine Benson, Bill and Mary Bliven, Don and Annette Feist, Pat Lynch, and Lloyd and Donna Tribitt (“Bensons”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claim that SRT Communications, Inc., is contractually obligated to provide them post-retirement health and medical benefits. We affirm the judgment, concluding the Bensons’ action is governed by federal law and they failed to raise a disputed issue of material fact.
*555I
[¶ 2] Northern States Power (“NSP”) owned a telephone business in Minot, North Dakota, which it sold in 1991 to Minot Telephone Company…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Knudson v. KylloNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Miller v. Walsh County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.