Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 11, 1995No. 13172PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss after the state refused to disclose the identity of the informant who had introduced an undercover police officer to a drug dealer, alleged to be the defendant. The informant was not present at the time of the criminal act alleged here. The court granted the state permission to appeal from the judgment of dismissal. We reverse the judgment of dismissal and remand the case for further proceedings.
The defendant was charged with violating General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 He pleaded…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harris v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. LyleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. Calderon-PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.