Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2012-207787; No. 5175PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.

This appeal arises out of Karl Ryan Lane’s conviction for first-degree burglary. On appeal, Lane argues the trial court erred (1) by refusing to grant a directed verdict when the evidence merely raised the suspicion of his guilt and the State failed to present substantial circumstantial evidence that he was guilty of first-degree burglary and (2) by refusing to charge the jury on the circumstantial evidence instruction he requested. We reverse.

*120FACTS

On April 21, 2011, firearms were stolen from a gun safe in Mark McSwain’s house. Pamela Holladay, McSwain’s neighbor, testified a car pulled into…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BostickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. ODEMSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. BrannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API