State v. Lane
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
This appeal arises out of Karl Ryan Lane’s conviction for first-degree burglary. On appeal, Lane argues the trial court erred (1) by refusing to grant a directed verdict when the evidence merely raised the suspicion of his guilt and the State failed to present substantial circumstantial evidence that he was guilty of first-degree burglary and (2) by refusing to charge the jury on the circumstantial evidence instruction he requested. We reverse.
*120FACTS
On April 21, 2011, firearms were stolen from a gun safe in Mark McSwain’s house. Pamela Holladay, McSwain’s neighbor, testified a car pulled into…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BostickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. ODEMSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. BrannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.