Hodge v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellant Hodge was the plaintiff below, and sued to recover damages for the alleged alienation of the affections of his wife by appellee Brooks, defendant below. The testimony made a case which would have supported the verdict had it been in Hodge’s favor, although no attempt was made to show that any immoral relation ever existed between Brooks and Mrs. Hodge, nor was there any testimony that these two had ever been seen in a compromising position, the nearest approach thereto being that it was testified that on one occasion Brooks showed Mrs. Hodge how to drive an automobile and during the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boland v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blaylock v. StreckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- State v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Maggay v. NikitkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Case v. RoeblingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Woodson v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.