Woodson v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The injury sought to be redressed in this form of action is loss of consortium.
In the civil law the term consortium signified a lawful Roman marriage. Black’s Law Diet. “Consortium.”
In the early common law it was limited to the rights of the husband growing out of the marriage relation. In modern law it has come to denote the rights of either consort, and may be said to include those collective rights of either husand or wife resulting from and inherent in the marital union. These rights have been defined in this form of action to include the person, affection, society, and assistance. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Boland v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Miller v. PearceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Rott v. GoehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Henley v. RockettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Swartz v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- McNelis v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Cook v. SweattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Carter v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.