Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. Strecker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1987No. 86-154PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellee, Paul Strecker, filed a suit for alienation of affections against appellant, Patricia Blaylock, alleging that appellant had caused the destruction of appellee’s marriage to Chloe Strecker. The jury found in favor of appellee Strecker and awarded $50,000.00 compensatory and $250,000.00 punitive damages. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Appellant’s first point of appeal concerns a ruling by the trial court which excluded the testimony of Debbie Strecker, the 20-year-old daughter of appellee and Chloe Strecker. The proffer of Debbie’s testimony reflects…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Pleasant v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  5. Arkansas Kraft Corporation v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API