Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Hausmann

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1993No. A-92-204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*389Irwin, Judge.

Larry R. and Olga J. Boyles, landowners in Pioneer Hills Subdivision, brought suit seeking a declaratory judgment regarding whether the defendants, also landowners in the subdivision, could amend an agreement containing restrictive covenants pertaining to the subdivision so as to include a setback provision for each lot. The district court found generally for the defendants and dismissed the Boyleses’ petition. The Boyleses subsequently perfected this appeal. For the reasons recited below, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause with directions.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

An action for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. FeldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Van Deusen v. BussmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyles v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Scholten v. Blackhawk PartnersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Boyles v. HausmannNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Scholten v. Blackhawk PartnersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API