Legal Opinion
Sharon v. Time, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 1984No. 83 Civ. 4660 (ADS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SOFAER, District Judge.
On June 12,1984, shortly before the first deposition of the plaintiff, which was limited to document discovery, the defendant submitted a “Statement of Relevant Issues for Purposes of Discovery From Plaintiff” (“Defendant’s Statement”). On August 17, 1984, plaintiff submitted a “Memorandum in Response to Certain Portions of ‘Defendant’s Statement of Relevant Issues for Purposes of Discovery From Plaintiff’ ” (“Plaintiff’s Memorandum”). Plaintiff’s Memorandum sought to ban defendant from engaging in discovery concerning, or from using at trial, evidence…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Sharon v. Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Schafer v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Frisk v. News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- United States v. Miracle Recreation Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.