Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Hudson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1890No. 14,517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— The facts in this case, as they appear in the complaint, are that on the 12th day of November, 1877, one A. D. Hudson executed to James Moorman a promissory note for the sum of $726, with the appellee, William W. Hudson, and Jacob B. Blazer, as sureties thereon. On the *50519th day of March, 1878, said Moorman recovered judgment on said note, in the Jay Circuit Court, against all the makers thereof, for the sum of $777.86, and costs of suit.

At the time of the rendition of said judgment the said Jacob B. Blazer was the owner of real estate in Jay county of the value'of $10,000, which was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Owen v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Sanders v. WeelburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Sterne v. Bank of VincennesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Comegys v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelso v. KelsoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. BurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Schabler v. Indianapolis Morris Plan Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. NUTT v. STATE Ex FULTONOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API