Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Cummins-Allison Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1993No. 1-92-0092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

deHvered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, Norman G. Doherty and his wife, Kelly G. Doherty, brought an action against defendants, Cummins-Allison Corporation (Cummins) and Rauenhorst Corporation (Rauenhorst), seeking damages for injuries sustained when Norman allegedly fell while on the premises of Cummins’ plant. The trial judge granted defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to sections 2 — 616(b) and 2 — 619(a)(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, pars. 2 — 616(b), 2 — 619(a)(5) (now 735 ILCS 5/2 — 616(b), 5/2 — 619(a)(5) (West 1992))) on the grounds that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Zeh v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wolf v. Meister-Neiberg, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Simmons v. HendricksIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Carlin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. Illinois Masonic Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Hartzog v. MartinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Strickland v. Communications & Cable of Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Wolf v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Pearl v. WaibelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API