Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Meister-Neiberg, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. 69939, 69953 consPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The issue presented by this appeal was certified by the trial court for interlocutory review pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (134 Ill. 2d R. 308) and provides as follows:

“In a slip and fall case does an amended complaint filed after the expiration of the statute of limitations relate back to the original timely-filed complaint when,(a) The location of the accident as alleged in the amended complaint differs materially from the location alleged in the original complaint, but(b) The defendants were on notice of the correct location prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations * *

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zeh v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wolf v. Meister-Neiberg, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Porter v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Boatmen's National Bank v. Direct Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cammon v. West Suburban Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Weber v. CuetoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API