Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Conaway

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 3, 2010No. Case 2:05-CV-40263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion Granting in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Remedies (Dkt. # 150) and Denying Its Motion To Strike (Dkt. # 179.)

STEVEN D. PEPE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

On August 23, 2005, the SEC filed a complaint against Conaway and McDonald alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC alleged that Defendants had made false statements of material facts, or omitted material facts which made their statements misleading in connection with the MD & A section of Kmart’s Form 10-Q(3) filed on November 27, 2001, and during the conference call held that day. A trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RazmilovicDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BravataDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. OVO Wealth Management, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. SwafferDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API