Legal Opinion

People v. Fulkman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1991No. E008136PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

—Defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction entered following a guilty plea to one count of unlawfully possessing heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). On appeal, defendant contends that the magistrate improperly denied his Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress certain evidence, because, he argues: (1) the magistrate failed to make an explicit finding that there was no choking or choke hold applied by the officers in removing a wad of heroin from defendant’s mouth; (2) the magistrate’s implied finding that there was no choking or choke hold…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nickols v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  5. People v. MolinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API