People v. Fulkman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ, P. J.
—Defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction entered following a guilty plea to one count of unlawfully possessing heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). On appeal, defendant contends that the magistrate improperly denied his Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress certain evidence, because, he argues: (1) the magistrate failed to make an explicit finding that there was no choking or choke hold applied by the officers in removing a wad of heroin from defendant’s mouth; (2) the magistrate’s implied finding that there was no choking or choke hold…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Nickols v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- People v. MolinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.