Legal Opinion

Nickols v. Morris

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 8, 2010No. 3:08-cv-00137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RESOLVING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AND RELATED MATTERS

TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.

In this case, inmate/plaintiff DeAnna Blair Nickols has claims remaining against two individual defendants: Gary Morris and Patrick Dean Smith. 1 These defendants have now filed a motion for summary judgment, along with a brief in support and an appendix. By the combined motion for summary judgment, Morris and Smith assert a qualified-immunity defense to Nickols’s claims that they subjected her to an unlawful seizure and excessive force in violation of her rights…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alex Crane v. James Johnson, ET AL.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2026
  2. Dupree v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
  3. Hargis v. Vulcan Construction Materials, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Irvin v. Prentiss County, MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
  5. Jimenez v. CVS Pharmacy IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API