Legal Opinion
Menke v. Glass
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 1995No. 93 Civ. 7072 (DC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
This is a ease brought by a group of investors in a limited partnership against one of the general partners, Daniel Glass, and Mr. Glass’s law firm, Migdal, Tenney, Glass & Pollack. Plaintiffs allege that defendants defrauded them and breached their fiduciary duties with respect to the purchase of a motion picture. Defendants move for summary judgment, on the basis that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
FACTS
In August 1981, a group of investors formed a limited…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dodds v. Cigna Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Armstrong v. McalpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Weiss v. La SuisseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- The Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAICDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999