Legal Opinion

Alker v. Philadelphia National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

372 Pa. 327 (1953)

Alker, Appellant,

v.

The Philadelphia National Bank.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued November 24, 1952.

January 12, 1953.

Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ.

Lemuel B. Schofield, with him Edwin Hall, 2nd, and Harry J. Alker, Jr., for appellant.

Arthur Littleton, with him John R. McConnell and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, January 12, 1953:

The Judgment of Non Pros is affirmed on the Opinion of President Judge FRANK SMITH.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alker v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Weinberg v. Commonwealth, State Board of Examiners of Public AccountantsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Class of Two Hundred Administrative Faculty Members v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  5. Hicks v. SaboeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API