Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Saboe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1989No. 33 and 161 E.D. Appeal Docket, 1988PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This appeal presents two questions: whether a land title insurance company can be liable directly to a widow whose late husband sold their entireties property by forging her signature on a deed, even though the widow was not insured by the title company; and whether the chancellor erred in holding that the widow's claims for rescission of the deed and reconveyance of the land were barred by laches so that she could not recover from the purchasers of the property. We hold that the land title company’s liability is limited to indemnification of its insured…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Payne v. KassabSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Wilson v. King of Prussia Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Kay v. KaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Hatbob v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Rood v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Golden v. CookDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API