Lucero v. Salazar
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles and Russell Lucero (Plaintiffs) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of Counts I and II of their complaint against Defendants Kenny Salazar and Richard Rohlfs (Defendants). Plaintiffs raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim for which immunity from suit was waived under the Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4-1 to -12 (Repl.Pamp.1989); and (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that Plaintiffs did not plead facts sufficient to establish state interference…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Calkins v. Cox EstatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Bober v. New Mexico State FairNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Ramirez v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Glover v. GartmanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Weinstein v. City of Santa Fe Ex Rel. Santa Fe Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Murphy v. BitsoihDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Thompson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.