Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Salazar

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1994No. 14498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

Plaintiffs Charles and Russell Lucero (Plaintiffs) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of Counts I and II of their complaint against Defendants Kenny Salazar and Richard Rohlfs (Defendants). Plaintiffs raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim for which immunity from suit was waived under the Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4-1 to -12 (Repl.Pamp.1989); and (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling that Plaintiffs did not plead facts sufficient to establish state interference…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Calkins v. Cox EstatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bober v. New Mexico State FairNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ramirez v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glover v. GartmanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  2. Weinstein v. City of Santa Fe Ex Rel. Santa Fe Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Murphy v. BitsoihDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
  4. Thompson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API