Legal Opinion

Yanez v. Minnesota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2009No. 08-2034PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Omar Yanez appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). The district court issued a certifícate of appeal-ability for Yanez’s claim that a Minnesota state court admitted out-of-court testimonial statements at his criminal trial in violation of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. We affirm the denial of post-conviction relief.

I

A state-court jury found Omar Yanez guilty of four counts of criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minnesota state law after he digitally penetrated his girlfriend’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. State v. PooleUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Garrison v. BurtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
  4. Eley v. VannoyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Muth v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API