Legal Opinion

Bijur v. Jacoby

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The plaintiffs, by the allegations of their complaint, have sought to state a cause of action against the defendant-appellant, the Sheriff of Kings county. A Sheriff who suffers a person, committed to jail for contempt of court, to go at large, “ until he is discharged by due course of law,” is hable to “ the party aggrieved ” for his damages sustained thereby. “ If the commitment was for the non-payment of a sum of money, the amount thereof, with interest, is the measure of damages.” (Correction Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 43], § 514.) Admittedly, the plaintiffs have stated a cause of action, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. London v. HessbergNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of KramskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. People ex rel. Tsagaris v. Sheriff of County of KingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Rosenblum v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API