Legal Opinion

London v. Hessberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order continuing this action against the executors of the defendant, the late Herman M. Hess-berg, sheriff of Kings county. The facts giving rise to the action are as follows: Plaintiff herein instituted an action against Salvatore and Rosini Lentini to compel them to specifically perform an agreement for the sale of real property. She obtained a judgment directing them to execute and deliver a deed and a lease to her and to accept a deed tendered them by her. They failed to do so and a contempt order was made, fining them $250 each and directing their arrest and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Bernstein v. Queens County Jockey ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Benjamin's Executors v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Bijur v. JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Producers Releasing Corporation De Cuba v. Pathe Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Conrad v. Certified Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Barrett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
  4. London v. HessbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API