Legal Opinion

Rosenblum v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1934Published

1DissentUntermyer, J.

The material facts are not in dispute. In September, 1928, the plaintiff commenced an action for separation in the Supreme Court of Kings county against her husband, Barnet Rosenblum. In that action alimony pendente lite at the rate of fifteen dollars per week was allowed by the court. The husband, having failed to make payments of alimony amounting to $575 on September 10, 1932, was committed to the New York county jail under an order of the Supreme Court of Kings county which adjudged him guilty of contempt of court. Accordingly, unless released pursuant to law, he was not entitled to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
  2. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Savacool v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Perkins v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Frees v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API