Legal Opinion

Hismoco (American) Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 28, 1978No. C.D. 4762; Court No. 76-9-02065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This action, which is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, involves the dutiable status of merchandise consisting of dried salted plums, invoiced as “Dried Plums” which was exported from Hong Kong and entered at the port of Los Angeles in November 1973. The merchandise was classified by the government under item 149.28 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as modified by T.D. 68-9, which covers .plums, prunes, and prunelles, otherwise prepared or preserved, and assessed with duty at the rate of 17.5% ad valorem) Plaintiff chai-*33lenges this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Delapenha v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. Aki Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Kwan Yuen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Data Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API