Legal Opinion

Haiss v. Schmukler

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

On July 17, 1920, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement by which defendant was to convey to plaintiff for $7,500 a dwelling at No. 1961 Cedar avenue, in the Bronx; $1,000 was paid upon the signing of the contract. There was nothing whatever in the contract which required plaintiff to take title subject to any tenancy or occupancy. There is a printed *575clause in the contract reading, “ rents and interest on mortgages, if any, are to be apportioned,” and to which the words “ and insurance ” have been interpolated in typewriting after the word “ mortgages.” Defendant contends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flickinger v. . GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Fruhauf v. . BendheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Poland Export Corp. v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Bullard v. BicknellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Gravenhorst v. ZimmermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klarfeld v. ReilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API