Haiss v. Schmukler
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.
On July 17, 1920, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement by which defendant was to convey to plaintiff for $7,500 a dwelling at No. 1961 Cedar avenue, in the Bronx; $1,000 was paid upon the signing of the contract. There was nothing whatever in the contract which required plaintiff to take title subject to any tenancy or occupancy. There is a printed *575clause in the contract reading, “ rents and interest on mortgages, if any, are to be apportioned,” and to which the words “ and insurance ” have been interpolated in typewriting after the word “ mortgages.” Defendant contends…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flickinger v. . GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Fruhauf v. . BendheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Poland Export Corp. v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Bullard v. BicknellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Gravenhorst v. ZimmermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klarfeld v. ReilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952