Morse v. Steele
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Noble Hamilton, R. M. F. Soto, and J. W. Dorsey, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In September, 1892, E. L. G-. Steele, the owner of a ranch in El Dorado County, entered into a written contract with plaintiff with reference to the care and proceeds of certain live-stock, which were to be and were delivered by plaintiff to Steele. By the terms of the contract plaintiff was to deliver about one hundred jacks, jennies, and mares to Steele upon his ranch. Steele was to receive the animals and care for them “as carefully as he did for his own stock.” They were to be bred for four years, and at the end of four years the colts were to be sold for the mutual benefit of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ellissen v. HalleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Morrow v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Morse v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Stark v. WellmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Vanderpool v. VanderpoolMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hays v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.