Morrow v. Barker
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. B. McGarvey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
On October 25, 1895, the defendant, as the administrator with the will annexed, published notice to creditors in the estate of Susan Berg, deceased, directing all creditors to present their claims within four months after the first publication of the notice.
*66January 2,1896, and before the time for presenting claims had expired, John Sundstrom died, without having presented his claim against the estate of Berg. February 20, 1896, letters of administration were duly issued to plaintiff on the estate of J ohn Sundstrom, deceased. February 25, 1896, the four months’ time specified in the notice to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tynan v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- In re the Estate of HildebrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by19 opinions
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Marshall v. Packard-Bell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Morse v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.