Legal Opinion
Kaskel v. Steinberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 31, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court from a decree of the Court of Probate for the district of Greenwich authorizing the defendants to sell real estate. In his motion for appeal he alleged that he was aggrieved. The defendants, by a plea in abatement and to the jurisdiction, alleged that the plaintiff was not, as a matter of law, aggrieved, since he had no pecuniary interest which was injuriously affected by' the decree. By his answer the plaintiff denied the allegations contained in the defendants’ plea. The Superior Court found the issues for the defendants upon the plea and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Cole v. Associated Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Housing Authority v. PezenikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Norton's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. DiSesaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Williams v. HouckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Kerin v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.