Legal Opinion
Kerin v. Goldfarb
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 2, 1971PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
Mildred Bennett Kerin and Marion Bennett Navel, hereinafter referred to as the plain tiffs, appealed to the Superior Court from a probate decree determining that the defendant Buth Bennett Lindsay, hereinafter referred to as Lindsay, was the sole heir and distributee of the intestate estate of Burton W. Kinne, of which the named defendant is administrator. Both defendants appeared specially and each filed a plea in abatement on the ground that the plaintiffs were not aggrieved persons because they had no interest in the estate. The Superior Court, on a stipulation of facts by all the parties,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- O'LEARY v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Close v. BenhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- City of Hartford v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Connecticut State Employees Ass'n v. Connecticut Personnel Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lenge v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.