Legal Opinion
United States v. Luther Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2014No. 12-60854PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Luther Arnold appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, claiming that the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”) compel his speech in violation of the First Amendment. We affirm.
I
In 1994, Arnold pleaded guilty of rape, incest, and homosexual acts in Madison County, Tennessee. As a result of the convictions, he was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to SORNA. 1 In 2011, he moved from Marshall County, Mississippi, to Tennessee but did not (a) notify Marshall County of his move, (b)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arthur Cutshall, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Hersh v. United States Ex Rel. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Book People, Incorporated v. WongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- M.S. Willman v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Robicheaux v. CaldwellDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Singleton v. CannizzaroDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
- State v. C. G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.