Legal Opinion
Arthur Cutshall, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1999No. 97-6276, 97-6321PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J., joined by Batchelder, J.,
JONES, J. (pp. 483-85), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Arthur Cutshall, challenges the constitutionality of the Tennessee Sex Offender Registration and Monitoring Act. Tenn.Code §§ 40-39-101 to - 108 (1994). The Act requires sex offenders to register with law enforcement agencies, and allows law enforcement officials to release registry information when necessary to protect the public. Cutshall is subject to the Act because of a 1990 Tennessee conviction for aggravated sexual battery. He challenges both the registration and the notification…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Femedeer v. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.