Legal Opinion

Helen Varnes v. Local 91, Glass Bottle Blowers Association of the United States and Canada

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1982No. 80-5908PublishedCited by 247 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Chief Judge:

Local 91, Glass Bottle Blowers Association, seeks relief from a default judgment entered upon an amended complaint. We hold that there was improper service of process of the amended complaint and reverse.

FACTS

Appellee Varnes filed suit in June 1978 against her employer, Anchor Hocking, and her union, Local 91, after Anchor Hocking discharged her for excessive absenteeism. The complaint alleged that Anchor Hocking breached a collective bargaining agreement by discharging Varnes and that Local 91 breached the same agreement by refusing to arbitrate her discharge. Copies of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by247 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. D. Omar Valdez, Worldstar Communications Corp. v. James S. FeltmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. William H. Davis v. Txo Production Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API