Legal Opinion

Varnell v. Henry M. Milgrom, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 857SC399PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The Statute of Frauds, G.S. 25-2-201, provides that contracts for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more are not enforceable unless evidenced by writing. The trial court expressly relied on G.S. 25-2-201 in denying plaintiffs claim based on the alleged oral modification. Plaintiff assigns error, arguing (1) the contract, an “output” contract, did not contain a price term and accordingly the statute did not apply and (2) defendants waived the statute by entering into the oral agreement.

H-l

Whether an output contract, see G.S. 25-2-306, is governed by G.S. 25-2-201 appears…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reigel Fiber Corporation v. Anderson Gin Company, Reibel Fiber Corporation v. Ellis BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Odom v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Alaska Independent Fishermen's Marketing Ass'n v. New England Fish Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Edelstein v. Carole House Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McDonald v. ScarboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Cotton v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. E. Brooks Wilkins Family Med., P.A. v. WakemedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API