Varnell v. Henry M. Milgrom, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The Statute of Frauds, G.S. 25-2-201, provides that contracts for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more are not enforceable unless evidenced by writing. The trial court expressly relied on G.S. 25-2-201 in denying plaintiffs claim based on the alleged oral modification. Plaintiff assigns error, arguing (1) the contract, an “output” contract, did not contain a price term and accordingly the statute did not apply and (2) defendants waived the statute by entering into the oral agreement.
H-l
Whether an output contract, see G.S. 25-2-306, is governed by G.S. 25-2-201 appears…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reigel Fiber Corporation v. Anderson Gin Company, Reibel Fiber Corporation v. Ellis BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Odom v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Alaska Independent Fishermen's Marketing Ass'n v. New England Fish Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Edelstein v. Carole House Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDonald v. ScarboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Allied Grape Growers v. Bronco Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Cotton v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- E. Brooks Wilkins Family Med., P.A. v. WakemedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.