Legal Opinion
Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. Ballard
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1940No. 9161PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
When this case was here before,1 it was on an appeal from a judgment on a verdict directed against appellant then, appellee now, on the ground that the primary cause of the “collision” was the negligence of plaintiff, in not operating his train at restricted speed, within the yard limits of the. station at Hagerman.
On this appeal, the railway company, assigning other grounds too, still insists *770that the verdict should have been directed for it on that ground. We thought then, that the case was not one for a direction. We thought then, that since, under the provisions…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Unadilla Valley Railway Co. v. CaldineSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rocco v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Walker v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation v. Tillie Mely, as Administratrix of the Estate of A. E. Mely, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Elizabeth v. Conemaugh Black Lick RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.