Consolidated Telephone Cooperative v. Western Wireless Corp.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Consolidated Telephone Cooperative (“Consolidated”) appealed from a judgment upholding the Public Service Commission’s ruling that Western Wireless Corporation (“Western”) need not obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity before offering wireless residential service in Regent. We conclude the Commission’s finding that Western’s wireless residential service is a commercial mobile radio service as defined by federal law is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We further conclude the Commission correctly ruled Western need not obtain a certificate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of EastonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carnett's, Inc. v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Grey Bear v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Dakota Systems, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Blitz v. Xpress Image, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.