Legal Opinion

Consolidated Telephone Cooperative v. Western Wireless Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2001No. 20010146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Consolidated Telephone Cooperative (“Consolidated”) appealed from a judgment upholding the Public Service Commission’s ruling that Western Wireless Corporation (“Western”) need not obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity before offering wireless residential service in Regent. We conclude the Commission’s finding that Western’s wireless residential service is a commercial mobile radio service as defined by federal law is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We further conclude the Commission correctly ruled Western need not obtain a certificate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of EastonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carnett's, Inc. v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Grey Bear v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Dakota Systems, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Blitz v. Xpress Image, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API