Legal Opinion
Aaron v. City of Tipton
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1941No. 27,480PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwaim, C. J.
The sufficiency of a notice served by the appellant on the city of Tipton prior to bringing an action against said city for damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by a defective sidewalk, is the sole question presented by this appeal. The only objection to the notice was that it was not verified.
Acts of 1933, ch. 111, § 2, p. 705 (§ 48-8002, Burns’ 1933, §12512, Baldwin’s 1934), provided that, “No action shall be brought or maintained by any person against any city . . . for damages suffered or claimed to have resulted from injuries to such person . . . unless written…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Touhey v. City of DecaturIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Galbreath v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Geyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Thompson v. City of AuroraIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Millman v. County of ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.