Legal Opinion

Porod v. Town of Cicero

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 13, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01591Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROSEMARIE POROD and ) WAYNE POROD, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) 18 C 1591 v. ) ) Judge Charles P. Kocoras TOWN OF CICERO, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Town of Cicero’s (the “Town”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Rosemarie Porod (“Rosemarie”) and Wayne Porod’s (“Wayne”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court grants the Town’s motion. STATEMENT The following facts are taken from the Plaintiffs’ Complaint and are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Alioto v. Town of LisbonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API