Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, providers of voice over internet protocol services (VoIP), challenge a Federal Communications Commission order requiring them to contribute to the Universal Service Fund. Specifically, they claim that, in requiring such contributions, the Commission exceeded its authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by (1) analogizing VoIP to wireline toll service for the purposes of setting the presumptive percentage of VoIP revenues generated interstate or internationally,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- SW General, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Doe v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- National Mining Ass'n v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- American Meat Institute v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Metropcs California, LLC v. Michael PickerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.