Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Ricketts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

As in a companion ease (In re C. E. Wheelock) decided this day, another attorney has been found guilty of dealing falsely with his client in a matter that did not produce a monetary loss to the client but which nevertheless was wholly inconsistent with a lawyer’s duty of fidelity to his client.

The accused, after representing an injured- workman in a compensation matter, found his client to be both irksome and demanding. The client insisted upon filing another claim. The accused falsely represented to his client that he had proceeded as requested with an aggravation claim. In fact,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re WheelockOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CristOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AlbrightOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API