Legal Opinion

In Re Wheelock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

439 P.2d 872 (1968)

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of C.E. WHEELOCK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Submitted March 26, 1968.

Decided April 17, 1968.

Dwight L. Schwab, Portland, for the accused.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE, and HOLMAN, JJ.

Submitted March 26, 1968, on Answer to Order to Show Cause.

2Per curiam

On January 23, 1968, we ordered C.E. Wheelock to show cause why his license to practice law in this state should not be suspended for misconduct. The misconduct did not cause loss to a client, nor was there evidence of serious moral fault. But it…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RickettsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of WHEELOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WheelockOregon Supreme Court · 1963

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CristOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AlbrightOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RickettsOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API