Beckley v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*53DIMOND, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of two counts of perjury and of being an accessory after the fact to the felony of murder in the first degree. This appeal followed.
Appellant had testified as a witness for the defense at the trial of George Fajeriak who was convicted of first degree murder. At appellant’s trial his testimony in the Fajeriak trial was introduced in evidence by the prosecution. Appellant claims that such testimony was inadmissible because prior to testifying at the Fajeriak trial he was not given the Miranda warning, that is, he was not warned that he had the right…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. LivelyMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Carman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.