Legal Opinion
Levy v. Gersten
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 17, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoneparth, J.
This is a motion by the defendants “ for an order dismissing the complaint nnder Buie 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, on the ground that it appears on the face of said complaint that both of said causes of action * * * fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. * * * u
The complaint herein contains two causes of action.
The first cause of action alleges, that the plaintiffs delivered a ring to Helen Gersten, one of the defendants, upon her engagement to the son of the plaintiffs; that on the 24th day of March, 1949, plaintiffs’ son and Helen Gersten by mutual consent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Fosdick v. Investors Syndicate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- McKnight v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldstein v. RosenthalCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Easley v. NealNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Nosonowitz v. KahnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951