Goldstein v. Rosenthal
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSidney H. Asch, J.
The gulf between the normative assumptions underlying law and human conduct has been wider in cases involving the return of engagement rings than in almost any other area of law. It is easy to program an engagement ring case so that a category selected from the law of contracts or gifts will supply a mechanical solution. But such a computerized result can hardly take into account the cultural realities, the behavioral complexities, or the ethical considerations which are involved.
This action is brought to recover an engagement ring, or, in the alternative, the sum of $2,450, the agreed value…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Andie v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Beck v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Wilson v. RiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heiman v. ParrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Lowe v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Cohen v. Bayside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Lewis v. PermutCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.