Legal Opinion
Easley v. Neal
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is a motion by the defendant for an order pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing the complaint on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the father of one Loma Ruth Easley, an adult; that on or about the 20th day of December, 1949, the defendant falsely stated and represented to *555the plaintiff that he was unmarried and desired to enter into marriage with the plaintiff’s daughter; that these representations “ were false and untrue, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Andie v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Sulkowski v. SzewczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Katz v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waddell v. BriggsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Goldstein v. RosenthalCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Vasinkevich v. Elm DrugsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Bruno v. GuerraNew York Supreme Court · 1990