Legal Opinion

Commerce Union Bank v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 1, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

In these consolidated cases the complainants sued the defendants on some promissory notes held by them and executed by the defendant, S. M. Pearson. It is alleged in the hills that the defendant S. M. Pearson had made fraudulent conveyances to his wife of certain lands in Rutherford County for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding the complainants of their just and lawful claims and the hills pray that the deeds to Mrs. Pearson be set aside and declared void as to them and that the property be subjected to the satisfaction of their claims. The defendants denied the material…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Blount County v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  2. James v. JosephTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Tennessee Eastern Electric Co. v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  4. Eve v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Fidelity Bond & Mortgage Co. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davidson v. BurgerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API